Research

• arXiv cs.RORoboticsOct 15

  LIBERO-PeRM: Benchmarking Personalized Robotic Manipulation

  Zhixu Li, Keqian Tang, Litian Gong, Jingyu Yao, Wenqian Zhang +5

  Personalization is essential for general-purpose robots to transition into household environments and achieve true practicality. While general robotic manipulation has been extensively studied, personalized robotic manipulation (PeRM) lacks a controlled benchmark for separating task completion from preference satisfaction. We introduce LIBERO-PeRM, a benchmark for preference learning in embodied agents. LIBERO-PeRM studies five questions: 1) how policies follow preferences in zero-shot settings; 2) how they learn single preferences from demonstrations; 3) how efficiently they acquire preferences as demonstrations increase; 4) how learned preferences generalize across layouts and tasks; and 5) how policies compose preferences and behave under conflicts. We propose a controlled formulation and taxonomy of observable preferences in simulation, covering motion, skill, and user-profile choices. This formulation is restricted to language-expressible preferences that can be instantiated in LIBERO without changing the task goal, evaluated automatically, and reused across tasks. Building on LIBERO, our procedural pipeline generates paired demonstrations with and without preferences. We…

  AIEvals80PDF
• arXiv cs.CVEvalsOct 15

  Grounding Generative Verification in 3D Content

  Shuanglin Li, Jiaying Lin, Shuquan Ye

  Recent advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs) and 3D generation have expanded 3D understanding and synthesis. However, beyond visual fidelity, task-specific correctness grounded in 3D evidence remains a major challenge. We argue that building reliable 3D systems requires not only stronger generation and reasoning, but also verification feedback that identifies unmet requirements and explains their violations, allowing systems to reflect on and refine their outputs. Such feedback must integrate multi-view observations and distinguish genuine inconsistencies from projection-dependent appearances. We make three contributions. First, we introduce 3DVerifierBench, a benchmark spanning 10 tasks that evaluates decisions, rejection explanations, and responses to controlled changes in specifications and candidates. A human study reveals a 21.6 percentage-point gap between humans and the strongest tested model, GPT-6 Astra, while explanation-aware analysis exposes weaknesses in rejection reliability. Second, we analyze verification across fine-grained factual categories, exposing errors in values and target binding. We develop a scalable pipeline combining multi-view fact…

  AIMultimodal70PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15▲ 23

  OmniVerifier-C1: Decomposed Graded Verifier for Rule-Governed Generative World Modeling

  Bowei Liu, Xinchen Zhang, Xuhuan Li, Tianlin Zhang, Kaian Jiang +8

  Generative visual verifiers play a crucial role in advancing multimodal intelligence. To enhance the robustness of visual verifiers in complex multimodal scenarios involving compositional requirements, we move beyond conventional binary verifiers that produce only True/False discrete judgments and introduce a verifier that automatically decomposes complex prompts or environmental rules into fine-grained components and assigns pointwise scores to provide a continuous and more informative critique signal. Our experiments further demonstrate that these structured and interpretable outputs improve the verifier's generalization to out-of-domain multimodal critic tasks. To train this verifier, we introduce a Decoupled RL training strategy that jointly optimizes sub-question-level binary judgment and global alignment scoring, using precise local feedback to develop fine-grained verification capabilities that provide a foundation for reliable continuous scoring at the global level. Under a general reinforcement learning framework, we first empirically demonstrate that the proposed pointwise graded verifier significantly outperforms binary verifiers in traditional text-to-image scenarios.…

  AIMultimodal70PDF
• arXiv cs.AIAgentsOct 15▲ 284

  FDE-Gym: The Last Mile of AI Delivery

  Dongxu Yang, Hongda Yan, Renxin Wang, Baoli Zhang, Haojia Zuo +21

  Existing agent benchmarks typically evaluate agents on well-specified tasks defined by issue reports, specifications, or task tickets. Real-world customer delivery is different: forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) must clarify ambiguous requirements, work in live systems, and uncover unstated constraints. We introduce FDE-Gym, a benchmark of 95 end-to-end delivery tasks from 20 customer scenarios across 18 sectors, each adapted by industry experts from real-world delivery projects. In simulated customer environments with scripted stakeholders and modifiable customer systems, agents interact with stakeholders and operate on production-like systems to deliver working solutions. FDE-Gym scores a delivery by how much it improves the customer's own success metric, normalized between 0 (unchanged system) and 1 (reference solution), with penalties for stakeholder interactions (messages, trial runs, and waiting time). An online platform lets humans practice FDE skills under the same grading criteria. We evaluate 13 model configurations from seven providers. In the realistic setting, where unstated constraints must be discovered, the best configuration achieves a mean FDE-Gym score of 0.56…

  AIEvals80Code
• arXiv cs.LGCode modelsOct 15

  Lean Graph Search for Formal Theorem Proving

  Yihan Xu, Jia-Chen Gu, Junyi Zhang, Di Wu, Haikang Deng +5

  Retrieving relevant lemmas is crucial for formal theorem proving, enabling provers to build machine-checkable proofs from established mathematical results. Recent retrieval systems match library declarations to a target theorem or its intermediate proof steps, but make limited use of multi-hop dependencies among declarations. These dependencies can reveal supporting lemmas that are not necessarily lexically similar to the target theorem but recur in proofs of related problems. To this end, we propose LeanGraphSearch, a graph-based retrieval method for Lean 4 that constructs a graph from Mathlib's forward dependencies and traverses it to uncover supporting lemmas through multi-hop dependency chains. Specifically, LeanGraphSearch links each declaration to the premises it depends on, uses a graph-based ranking algorithm to propagate relevance from semantically matched declarations to their dependencies, and reranks the expanded candidates against the original query. Across two mathematical retrieval benchmarks, LeanGraphSearch improves recall by up to 12% over the strongest baseline, LeanSearch v2, on MathlibQR and increases coverage of complete annotated proof routes on MathlibMPR,…

  AIEvals60PDF
• arXiv cs.AIEvalsOct 15

  Evaluation Awareness Beyond English: Do LLMs Act Differently When Tested in Indic Languages?

  Trizal Garg, Sibayan Mitra, Arya Karanjkar, Advait Singh, Jagat Sesh Challa +4

  Large language models (LLMs) can often tell when they are being tested. This ability, known as evaluation awareness, can lead models to act more cautiously during safety evaluations than in real use. Existing work has studied evaluation awareness almost entirely in English, although models serve users in many languages. Indic languages are spoken by over a billion people, yet evaluation awareness remains almost entirely unstudied in them. We test four instruction-tuned models from three families in five Indic languages alongside English. A set of cues varies whether the model is told that it is monitored and whether the monitoring is a safety test. Models refuse harmful requests more often when they are told that they are being tested. This increase appears in all four models and all six languages. In Indic languages, refusal of harmful requests rises by 14.4 percentage points on average. The test cue also brings Indic refusal of harmful requests level with English, but raises refusal of benign Indic requests from 6.9% to 11.3%. We release all 47,880 judged responses to support further work. These results suggest that safety evaluations in Indic languages may not reflect how…

  AIAI safety70PDF
• arXiv cs.CLTraining & fine-tuningOct 15▲ 3

  Training Reasoning Models to Generate Diverse Scientific Ideas

  Manya Wadhwa, Pranav Narayanan Venkit, Hiroaki Hayashi, Yu Li, Tuhin Chakrabarty +1

  One of the first steps of a research pipeline is generating ideas. Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to automate this step, but most of this work optimizes the quality of individual ideas, while overlooking diversity. In our work, we study document-grounded ideation, focusing on increasing the diversity of LLM generated ideas and ensuring they are high quality. Given prior papers, a model must propose a set of ideas that are each high-quality and clearly distinct from one another, while also being grounded in the input documents. To optimize for this, we propose training with a set-level reinforcement learning objective. In our setup, in a single generation, the model writes K structured idea cards grounded in the source papers, and the set is scored jointly, where each idea's quality is weighted by its distance from the ideas written before it. This teaches the model to steer each new idea away from its predecessors. We show that our trained 8B model achieves higher creative utility (a measure combining quality and diversity) than Claude Opus 4.8 and GPT-6 Astra on our contamination-free benchmark. In a pilot human study with four experts, our sets are judged as…

  AIEvals70Code
• arXiv cs.CVEvalsOct 15▲ 9

  AVC-Reward: Event-Centric Audio-Video Consistency Evaluation

  Yuruo Wu, Kaihang Pan, Kai Shen, Jiacheng Li, Shuyuan Tu +4

  As joint audio-video generation models become more capable, they can generate audio-visual scenes exhibiting three forms of complexity: multi-event composition, multi-layer audio mixture, and asymmetric cross-modal relations. However, current evaluations largely reuse metrics from earlier simple and unidirectional tasks. They typically evaluate an audio-video clip as a whole and rely on simple predefined relations, making them unsuitable for these increasingly complex scenes. We propose an event-centric evaluation framework that disentangles audio and visual events at the event level, analyzes each event independently, cross-validates relations across modalities, and aggregates the judgments into a coarse-to-fine, three-level consistency metric. The metric assesses global narrative harmony, event-level temporal synchronization, and fine-grained attribute alignment, providing a general formulation for audio-video consistency evaluation across diverse generation settings and cross-modal relations. We instantiate the metric as AVC-Reward, a trainable audio-video reward model. To evaluate the agreement between automatic judgments and human perception across generation paradigms and…

  AIMultimodal70Code
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  MindEval2: Clinically Grounded Patients and Rubrics for Evaluating Language Models in Mental Health Support

  John Mendonça, Daniel Tschernutter, José Pombal, Areti Vassilopoulos, Catarina Botelho +4

  With people increasingly turning to AI chatbots for mental health support, the need to evaluate these tools is becoming more pressing. Recent benchmarks attempt to mimic a realistic setting by simulating multi-turn interactions with synthetic patients and evaluating them with an LLM-as-a-judge. However, the usefulness of these methods is limited because simulated patients can be overly forthcoming and self-reflective, and judgments typically involve opaque Likert scales with unclear practical utility. To bridge these gaps, we introduce MindEval2, an evaluation framework that consists of two components: Mental Health Quality Rubrics (MHQR), for evaluation, and MindSim, for patient simulation. For MHQR, we collaborate with PhD-level psychologists to develop a set of rubrics that break down response quality into explicit operational criteria that are more interpretable and actionable than existing evaluation taxonomies. MindSim, in turn, is an LLM harness that combines carefully-designed patient profiles with tools, enabling more varied, challenging, and realistic interactions than existing baselines. The harness also contains a memory component that is updated between each…

  AI70PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  Grid-Bench: Can LLMs Predict How Discrete Worlds Change?

  Zixiang Xu, Zirui Song, Wanrong Zheng, Chiyu Zhang, Yue Huang +14

  Spatial instructions describe how to move objects, transform regions, or modify their surroundings. When several operations are applied in sequence, each acts on a configuration shaped by earlier changes. How accurately can large language models (LLMs) predict the resulting spatial state? We introduce Grid-Bench, an executable benchmark in which eight families of operations transform discrete worlds represented as two-, three-, and four-dimensional grids. Given an initial grid, explicit rules, and an event history expressed as text, a model predicts the complete final grid. Reference execution makes every predicted value checkable, supporting comparisons across spatial operations, history lengths, and workloads. Evaluating six LLMs shows that complete-state accuracy falls sharply as histories grow, with substantial divergence among models that perform similarly on single events. Models with similar exact-match accuracy can nevertheless differ substantially in the number of incorrect cells on shared instances. Even over long histories, some models recover many correct changes beyond what copying the initial state would yield. Grid-Bench makes both complete recovery and these…

  AI60PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  Knowledge That Is Linear Before Fine-Tuning Generalizes After It

  Faridoun Mehri, Hinrich Schütze

  Not all facts a language model can recall support further learning equally well. We distinguish active facts, which support generalization beyond their own recall, from inert facts, which can be recalled but do not support such generalization in a given task. We study this distinction by constructing new relations from existing ones. Take the relation that maps a place to its continent (Paris -> Europe) and assign each of its answers an arbitrary new label (Europe -> crab, Asia -> zebra). The new relation then maps Paris -> crab. We fine-tune the model on the new relation for a subset of subjects, without telling it the original relation or the relabeling rule, and test whether it assigns the corresponding labels to held-out subjects that share an answer in the original relation. Having learned Paris -> crab, does it answer Munich -> crab? Across eleven language models and 70 relations, how linearly readable the original relation is in pretrained representations strongly predicts this generalization. Within each model, the two correlate across relations at Pearson r = 0.87 to 0.92. This association persists when controlling, separately and jointly, for the number of fine-tuning…

  AITraining & fine-tuning60PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  AI Consilium: a Benchmark of LLM Clinical Multidisciplinary Second Opinions

  Alexey A. Bokov, Ivan I. Panin, Nikolay B. Nechaev, Mikhail Yu. Valkov, Valeria Yu. Chernina +8

  Large language models (LLMs) can generate differential diagnoses for complex cases, but a useful second opinion must also be factually grounded, clinically coherent, actionable, and safe. We developed a multidimensional benchmark using 300 diagnostically resolved NEJM--MedQA cases: 110 for physician reference ratings and Judge calibration and 190 for held-out evaluation. Eight single-model pipelines generated independent role-specific opinions and interactive-consilium reports under free-form and structured clinical-reasoning conditions. A physician-calibrated LLM Judge evaluated 3,040 final reports and the corresponding structured primary-role outputs. Model identity separated report quality more strongly than response format. Structured final reports had higher overall mean scores in seven of eight model pipelines, with their clearest advantage in management (2.740 vs. 2.436). Compared with the structured pre-consilium primary-role opinion, the complete structured synthesis had higher pooled scores across all five shared criteria, with the largest increases in problem prioritization, factual grounding, and reasoning coherence. GPT-5.6-Sol led every evaluated component and…

  AI70PDF
• arXiv cs.CVEvalsOct 15

  FPG-Seg: Annotation-free Retinal Vessel Topology Segmentation

  James Willoughby, Irina Voiculescu

  State-of-the art approaches to retinal vessel segmentation typically require extensive annotations, a highly time-consuming process, reliant on clinical expertise. We present FPG-Seg, an annotation-free pipeline for retinal vessel segmentation combining classical vesselness filtering, Bayesian deep learning and topology-aware graph reconstruction to segment retinal vessel topology without manual labels. Tested across four widely used benchmark datasets for retinal vessel segmentation, FPG-Seg attains a clDice of $0.74{-}0.78$, representing $86{-}98\%$ of the performance of an equivalent fully-supervised baseline, despite using no manual annotations for training or hyperparameter tuning. As part of this work, we also provide, to our knowledge, the first performance benchmark of an annotation-free vessel segmentation method on FIVES.

  AIComputer vision50PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  Not X, but When: Diagnosing a Mandarin LLM Writing Tic through Contextual Appropriateness

  Yihang Peng, Yi Jing, Dewen Liu, Weihan Meng, Ying Liu

  Recurring expressions in model-written text are often treated as signatures of machine authorship, yet most of them serve legitimate functions. Whether such an expression is a tic depends on whether the model knows when it is called for. This judgment of appropriateness, central to communicative competence, remains largely unexamined for language models. We study it through the Mandarin corrective construction bushi X, ershi Y ("not X, but Y"). Drawing on Gricean pragmatics and corrective negation, we introduce a decision tree that classifies uses as substantive, optional, or defective by testing whether the context makes X a live alternative and whether rejecting X is informative. Five commercial models use the construction 2.5 to 9.2 times as densely as a human reference. Of 307 annotated uses, only 1.30% are defective while 52.8% are optional, that is, correct but unneeded, so models fall short in appropriateness far more often than in correctness. Several reward models favor the construction even over quality-matched variants, an LLM judge favors it even where the context does not license it, and both supervised fine-tuning and preference optimization tend to raise its…

  AI60PDF
• arXiv cs.AIAI safetyOct 15

  Shortcut Sensitivity in Agent-Safety Evaluations

  Hasan Demirkiran, Jens Ernstberger

  AI agents take actions through tools. Some actions are sensitive, so guards that supervise them must themselves be evaluated reliably. Yet the data used to evaluate a guard can include cues that make labels predictable without measuring the intended safety construct, and those cues can also influence guard decisions. We introduce a three-level shortcut-auditing framework and audit completed LinuxArena trajectories and two TS-Bench-derived step datasets. We distinguish label predictability, observational guard association, and paired decision sensitivity. In LinuxArena, shorter average shell commands strongly predict trajectory labels. In AgentDojo-Traj, exact-tool lookup falls from F_1=.901 with mixed-domain folds to .495 under domain holdout. In AgentHarm-Traj, released TS-Guard F_1 falls from .902 under row weighting to .719 with equal interaction weighting, while balanced accuracy rises. We then test the strongest safe-row marker association in a seven-configuration screen on a frozen 64-step AgentDojo-Traj cohort using repeated, interleaved Haiku calls. Rewriting the <INFORMATION> marker lowers blocking by 8.33 percentage points, while opaque tool aliases raise it by 11.46…

  AIEvals80PDF
• arXiv stat.MLEvalsOct 15

  SurvICL: a Foundation Model for in-context Survival Analysis

  Julie Alberge, Linus Bleistein, Judith Abécassis, Marine Le Morvan, Gaël Varoquaux +1

  Tabular foundation models (TFMs) now outperform gradient-boosted trees in classification and regression. Yet in survival analysis, which predicts when an event occurs from censored data, often on small clinical cohorts, we find that no existing TFM beats the half-century-old Cox model. We address this issue by introducing SurvICL, a TFM that predicts survival curves in-context. SurvICL is pretrained on purely synthetic datasets generated from a novel flexible proportional-odds prior that outperforms other prior types in our ablation study. Unlike most other survival models, SurvICL is trained with a plain quantile regression loss, which is possible because its synthetic pre-training data generator can provide uncensored event times. Additionally, we introduce the largest survival benchmark to date spanning 103 datasets. On the 63 datasets held out from all design decisions, SurvICL outperforms 20 tree-based, deep, and foundation-model baselines without any tuning: it wins 82.9\% of pairwise comparisons in integrated Brier score, against 71.3\% for the runner-up, the Cox model, and is the first model to rank above Cox on small datasets.

  AI70PDF
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  Beyond Downstream QA: Rethinking How We Evaluate Agent Memory

  Sebastian-Antonio Toma, Jean de Kernier, Mike Ply, Oliviu Matei

  Agent memory benchmarks evaluate whether an agent's responses reflect correct knowledge, measuring downstream question-answering accuracy as a proxy for memory quality. We show this evaluation paradigm is incomplete: it conflates memory correctness with retrieval and generation quality, producing both false positives where correct responses mask broken memory and false negatives where incorrect responses blame correct memory for retrieval failures. We introduce FEB-30, a benchmark of 30 fact-evolution trajectories spanning 6 diagnostic categories and 3 difficulty levels, constructed via paradigm inversion: documents are generated from known fact trajectories, yielding deterministic ground truth without human annotation. Each trajectory defines how a fact should evolve across multi-author artifacts (documents, emails, conversations), enabling direct inspection of the memory store after each ingestion step. Applying FEB-30 to a representative memory system, we demonstrate that intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation diverge by an average of 16 percentage points, with 44% of trajectories exceeding meaningful divergence thresholds. Diagnostic decomposition reveals that the system…

  AIAgents60PDF
• arXiv cs.CLAgentsOct 15

  Hy-Memory-30B-A3B: Attributed Reinforcement Learning for Long-Term Memory Writing

  Tianxiang Fei, Jiazheng Kang, Mao Zheng, Xingyan He, Xiang Yu

  External-memory systems extend language-model applications beyond a context window, but their quality depends critically on the model executing the write path: deciding what to retain, how precisely to represent it, and how new evidence should update persistent state. Existing frameworks typically place a general-purpose large language model behind framework-specific prompts. This raises serving cost, and a writer specialized for one protocol does not transfer directly to another; a unified model that can operate across established memory frameworks remains largely unexplored. We present Hy-Memory-30B-A3B, a compact long-term-memory writer trained across Mem0, MemOS, and Hy-Memory. Memory On-Policy Distillation teaches framework-specific write protocols on student-generated states; Memory RL then optimizes downstream answerability using dense per-chunk probes, attributed cross-chunk rewards, over-storage controls, and chunk-level GRPO. Carrying policy-written banks across windows keeps training aligned with deployment. On fixed 20% benchmark subsamples, Hy-Memory-30B-A3B ranks first on all four evaluated harnesses, including held-out EverMemOS, with a 55.49% macro average versus…

  AIEvals70Model
• arXiv cs.CLEvalsOct 15

  Change the Number, Change the Answer: Assessing Rating Scale Sensitivity in LLM-Based Text Scoring

  Wonjeong Jo, Gyuwan Kim, Ming Shan Hee

  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used in computational social science to assign scalar scores to social and psychological constructs. However, studies use different rating scales, and whether their scores remain comparable across scale designs is understudied. To address this gap, we define and systematically investigate scale sensitivity, the variation in LLM-generated scores caused by rating scale design. We distinguish numerical sensitivity, changes in normalized scores, from semantic sensitivity, changes in score interpretation. To assess both, our experimental design crosses 2 formats (continuous vs. ordinal), 4 ranges (3, 5, 11, and 21 points), and 2 signs (signed vs. unsigned) across 3 tasks (political leaning, sentiment, and toxicity), 2 prompting strategies (zero-shot and rubric-based), and 5 LLMs. We find that changing one design element shifts normalized scores by about 0.10 on average and changes the category of roughly 20% of texts. Sensitivity is greatest for toxicity, the only unipolar construct examined. Also, rubric-based prompting does not reduce sensitivity compared with zero-shot prompting. We provide practical guidance for designing more reliable…

  AI50PDF
• arXiv cs.CVMultimodalOct 15▲ 2

  EVA-Cap: Optimizing Audiovisual Video Captioning via Event-Centric Alignment

  Jiapeng Shi, Qiuxia Hou, Jiaqi Leng, Junke Wang, Yanhao Zhang +3

  Recent advances in Omni Language Models (OLMs) provide a unified solution for audiovisual video captioning. Nevertheless, existing approaches predominantly treat captioning as an unstructured text generation process, neglecting the inherent semantic structure of videos and leading to suboptimal fine-grained audiovisual alignment. To bridge this gap, we propose EVA-Cap, a novel framework that decomposes captions into atomic audiovisual events and transforms unstructured text supervision into event-centric alignment. We train EVA-Cap via Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) on a self-curated dataset, EVA-Data, which is built with event-centric quality control. During the GRPO phase, the model is explicitly optimized against three event-centric alignment targets: global event completeness, intra-event attribution, and inter-event synchronization. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EVA-Cap significantly outperforms existing methods in event-centric evaluation (e.g., +9.0% average gain on ChronusAV), while achieving competitive performance on general audiovisual captioning benchmarks (e.g., +3.3% on WorldSense).

  AIEvals70PDF

• Realistic end-to-end agent evaluation in ambiguous, live systems1 paper raises it · 1 addresses it

  Current benchmarks often use well-specified tasks, but real-world delivery requires handling ambiguity, live systems, and unstated constraints.

  • FDE-Gym: The Last Mile of AI Deliveryraises · addresses
• Scalable and realistic GUI agent training and evaluation environments1 paper raises it · 1 addresses it

  GUI agent progress is limited by the high cost of interactive environments and scarcity of realistic training tasks.

  • MAI-Gym: An Open All-in-One Platform for GUI Agent Evaluation and RL Training across Mobile and Computer Environmentsraises · addresses
• Evaluating long-horizon harness engineering for coding agents1 paper raises it · 1 addresses it

  Existing benchmarks focus on task success under fixed harnesses, leaving harness engineering itself unexplored.

  • Doc2Harness: Benchmarking LLMs on Long-Horizon Harness Engineering of Coding Agentsraises · addresses
• Systematic 3D consistency evaluation for generative video worlds1 paper raises it · 1 addresses it

  Current benchmarks do not comprehensively assess 3D consistency in interactive world models, leaving geometric and spatial stability underexplored.

  • Orbia: Do Generated Videos Form a Consistent 3D World?raises · addresses
• Fine-grained, interpretable evaluation for complex multimodal generation2 papers raise it · 2 address it

  Binary or coarse-grained verifiers fail to provide detailed, actionable feedback for complex multimodal tasks like audio-video consistency or rule-governed world modeling.

  • OmniVerifier-C1: Decomposed Graded Verifier for Rule-Governed Generative World Modelingraises · addresses
  • AVC-Reward: Event-Centric Audio-Video Consistency Evaluationraises · addresses

Named by an AI from these papers' abstracts.