Getting Your Guidance Weights Right in diffusion and flow-matching posterior sampling

Liam Moroy, Jean-François Giovannelli, Yoann Altmann, Steve McLaughlin, Frédéric Champagnat +1

Training-free posterior sampling methods, also known as Plug-and-Play methods, leverage pretrained unconditional diffusion or flow-matching models to solve inverse problems. Most existing approaches rely on guidance weights to balance, at each time step, prior information from the unconditional score or velocity network with measurement consistency, yet the tuning of these weights is often not discussed and is largely left to heuristics. We introduce a simple and principled offline strategy for automatically tuning these guidance weights. Our key observation is that, at each time step, the conditional denoising score-matching objective for diffusion models, or the conditional flow-matching objective for flow-matching models, is a least-squares objective. Therefore, when the conditional prediction is expressed as a weighted sum of the unconditional network output and a measurement-guidance term, optimizing over these weights reduces to a two-dimensional linear least-squares problem. The resulting time-dependent guidance weights can be optimized offline for a given measurement operator, noise level and sampler at the cost of a single minibatch of sampling trajectories, without…