Shared Geometry Is Not Shared Physics: A Layerwise Test of the Platonic Representation Hypothesis in Astronomy

Kshitij Duraphe, Aravind Kannappan, Dun Li Chan, Okiki Famutimi, Yaswant Sai Ejjagiri +2

In this paper we investigate whether geometrically aligned astronomical representations are also scientifically interchangeable. We analyze every layer's representation from 36 pretrained models using cross-matched optical images, infrared images, and spectra. All 139 analyzed model-survey comparisons show significant local-neighborhood alignment somewhere in the network after accounting for the search over depth. However, alignment does not generally increase with network depth and can be stronger for the changes between consecutive computational blocks than for the block outputs themselves. We find that geometry-selected stages under-perform label-selected stages in every image-transfer comparison; moreover, every final HSC-COSMOS-Web model pair is aligned while every redshift transfer has negative R^2. Models can therefore recover a similar cross-survey geometry among astronomical objects without recovering a survey-invariant linear encoding of the physical properties tested here.