Learning to Reason Efficiently with Interventional Step Credit

Guanda Li, Xuefeng Bai, Yulong Chen, Zhiyong Wang, Kehai Chen +1

Large reasoning models often produce lengthy chain-of-thought (CoT) traces mixing useful intermediate steps with unnecessary ones. Recent methods explore step-level signals such as attention mass and step entropy to identify and suppress unnecessary steps. Despite their effectiveness, such signals reflect the model's behavior at a step rather than that step's contribution to the answer. To address this, we propose the interventional step credit (ISC), which takes a causal-intervention view and assesses step importance to the reasoning through targeted parameter-level interventions. Building on ISC, we further propose IGPO, which uses ISC to guide fine-grained advantage rescaling in reinforcement learning, reducing redundant steps while preserving the important ones. Experiments across two model scales and nine benchmarks show that IGPO achieves up to 62% average token reduction and better overall performance among compared methods.